My Representation

“Whenever we read an Armenian news story or hear of an Armenian who’s reached the highest echelons of success, let us not dismiss each report with a glance and flip of the page. Let us think of what has brought these people into the news. Let us imagine their lives, their sorrows, their happiness, and their identity as humans and Armenians alike.”

– KARMUN KHOO in The Armenite article: “Learning Armenian: The Art of Telling An Armenian Story” 

Armenians have a hidden, rich, and dense history within American society and culture. Whether that be due to dispersion from the 1915 Armenian Genocide or through immigration to the US in hopes of achieving the American Dream, Armenians are everywhere. Like many other Caucasus regions and Middle Eastern ethnicities, Armenians have gravitated towards Los Angeles and New York in hopes of accelerating in vast and robust cities, an escape from the homeland due to ethnic cleansing, poor politics, and leadership, and hopes for a better life for their families. America has always been the ideal place to thrive, idolize, follow dreams, adapt quickly, and call home. Like America, we value storytelling deeply. Armenian culture is always present and translated into storytelling, as it becomes one of the best ways to preserve and remember a culture—a fear Armenians have. The only way to contain a story in storytelling is to keep it in our minds and translate it visually within film. 

A Glimpse of America heavily relies on the entertainment being produced. As American entertainment became the backbone for media and that glimpse of American culture either overseas or within the country, entertainment exists and thrives here in the US. Therefore, like any other powerful and seemingly relevant culture, it immensely impacts the media and communication. So, how a group of people are portrayed is implicitly understood as true. This video is meant to shed light on how Armenian representation within American media is unjust and inaccurately portrayed—often depicted through stereotypical and two-dimensional characters. We have become a part of a trend of ethnicity that is often associated with weird, vile, and degrading labels within the media. According to the UCLA Hollywood Diversity Report, show creators that are of MENA background are low: 

“In digital, show creators’ race/ethnicity breaks down as follows for the 2021-22 season: Asian (3.55 percent), Black (12.26 percent), Latinx (2.90 percent), MENA (1.29 percent), multiracial (4.84 percent), Native (0.65 percent), and White (74.52 percent). Of the nine Latinx show creators, one was Black Latinx. Of the eleven Asian show creators, four were South Asian” (Rámon et al., 2023). 

The report analyzes creators and leads within the industry that reflect the racial categories within each entertainment sector. Middle Eastern and North African individuals are consistently nearly invisible regarding writers, producers, and directors. 

The films and television shows listed within the blog posts and edited within the video are just examples of how Hollywood utilizes “casual” racism. These negative perceptions harm our community and communities alike. Lily Torosyan, in her article for h-pem: “From blackface to ‘filthy Armenians: A commentary on Hollywood’s casual racism:” depicts the types of shows and movies that degrasse Armenians and shares her thoughts on the subject: 

“As a people who have survived a genocide, we know what it is like to be betrayed by our government and to lose our human rights. And, as the descendants of these survivors, we take offense to the ways in which we are defined on screen—ways that, for example, portray us as unhygienic, deranged rapists. Simply put, racism is never “casual.” Though often touted as the world’s most effective “soft power” tool, Hollywood perhaps earns too much credit for simply wielding the tides of public sentiment and established values of the time. In the early 20th century, Armenian Americans fought tooth and nail for acceptance as a viable minority group, overcoming racist policies that sought to exclude them from society at large. The films and shows in this article are inevitable products of the historically negative perceptions of Armenians in American society” (Torosyan, 2019). 

Armenians are a testimony of the resiliency of the human spirit. The constant struggle of fear from ethnic cleansing to not being taken seriously in American society and especially within wide recognition within entertainment we feel invisible. 

As someone who loves films and television, this lack that I have noticed drove me to make this statement video. From my previous experience of working on entertainment projects and my time as a college student, I was encouraged to develop profound content for our community while learning the discipline and passion it takes to execute such tasks. I aimed to share and stress our culture’s beauty while highlighting and bringing awareness to members of the Armenian community, who are often dismissed due to traditional norms.

 It brought me to understand the reasoning as to why we need to improve in the industry. To answer the question of how Armenian filmmakers can reshape our culture’s depiction in American media, Supporting Armenian filmmakers is the first step to battle this issue by watching Armenian stories made by Armenian filmmakers.

———————————————————————————————————————————————

Sources: 

https://www.h-pem.com/en/analysis/2019/01/27/hollywood-casual-racism-armenian-blackface/13/

Video credits (in order): 

Trevor Noah: Trump Confidently Declares Himself a “Stable Genius”: The Daily Show https://youtu.be/bbD_gKexiZw?si=48lqxEBD8SRR1vJP

Sopranos S06E08 – “Drama”

Magic Mike XXL (2015)

#BlackAF (2020) – S01E02 “because of slavery too”

American Dad! – S04E13 “Jack’s Back” 

American Dad! – S09E07 “Faking Bad”

Family Guy – S15E12 “Peter’s Def Jam”

The Simpsons – S23E22 “Lisa Goes Gaga” 

Chernobyl (2019)

Weeds – S06E11 “Viking Pride” 

Family Guy – S11E23 “No Country Club for Old Men” 

The Color of Pomegranates (1969)

Rosali (2023) 

The Men (1973)

Lost & Found in Armenia (2012)

Ote, Tote, Tvanki Kote (2023) 

Amerikatsi (2023) 

Lengthy Night (2018)

Back to Ashtarak (2023)

Armenian Papers (2023)

Wounds of War (2023) 

250KM (2023)

Parev Mama (2020) 

No Thanks (2023) 

Aurora’s Sunrise (2023)

Should the Wind Drop (2023) 

Tevanik (2014)

Taniel (2018) 

Vodka Lemon (2003) 

Women in Black (2023) 

Arshile Gorky Ararat Excerpts (2014) 

Song – Artsakh by Ara Gevorgyan

Orchestrated Horror

The United States’ involvement with the Middle East after the 9/11 attacks reflected failed deterrence and counterterrorism, destabilizing the region, inability to distinguish between civilians and combatants, and attempts to push democracy, leading to the country’s distaste and attitudes. Illegally detaining Iraqi citizens adds to the list of how our military can abuse its power. 

This image is one of the most infamous images that reflected the horrors and abuse committed by the United States Army and Central Intelligence Agency to Iraqi prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison. The series of human rights violations and war crimes committed by the US Army and CIA during the early stages of the Iraq war were under the Bush administration. Fueled by the DOJ, Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, and Janis Karpinski, chief officer of the US Army Reserve, allowed immense torture, corruption, and atrocities of innocent and illegally captured Iraqi civilians. 

This image and other abuse and torture photographic evidence that resurfaced in 2003 by an army personnel whistleblower publicized these photos and shocked the world. The image of the prisoner is known as Abdou Hussain Saad Faleh, who, along with the other thousands of prisoners, was subjected to humiliation, physical and sexual abuse, and psychological torture by American soldiers. He is pictured standing on a food ration box, with electrodes attached to his fingertips, neck, and genitals. He is wearing a cloak on his body and a trash bag on his face, posing with his arms resembling Jesus on the cross. 

The photo manipulation I created was to show how the photographic torture of Abu Ghraib under Google Images is always censored or pixelated due to its sensitive and disturbing nature. This translates to how its complexity and purpose of being censored reflect how an act so awful and obscene can become committed by a group of individuals meant to protect us. I added images of the prison scandal, army generals, US involvement in Iraq, Guantanamo Bay, and Saddam Hussein and George W. Bush in each pixel. This new interpretation of the image symbolizes every intricate detail sadistic individuals orchestrated how every image represents one horror to another meant to be covered, hidden, or forgotten about to protect the image and reputation of the United States. 

Original Image: known as Abdou Hussain Saad Faleh, photographer unknown

Manipulated Image:

Dropbox of images


Liar, Liar, Capitol Hill on Fire

“George Santos had an awkward first day at the office.” 

Washington Post: by Dan Zak and Ben Terris

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2023/01/03/george-santos-first-day-in-congress/

SOURCE: The Washington Post is famously known for being left-leaning on the media bias scale. The article is humorous about the third district elected representative, George Santos. It’s important to note that the Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, who has been reported to be more active in the company’s operations. The proximity to this article being written is close, as it was reported and quoted from other representatives a few days after the House chamber event for the oath of office space. The independence aspect of the article was clear that the Washington Post wanted to ridicule him with photos, and ABC journalist Lalee Ibssa posed questions that do so as the majority is aware of the confusing timeline and fabrication of Santos’s personal life and motivations for running for office. The expertise in the article is leveled; However, they reference five pieces, one being the New York Times. The Washington Post seems to have been closing following this individual’s patterns and speeches since he ran for office and election last year. 

MOTIVE: Infotainment is the most plausible criterion to categorize this article into. It applies both an understanding of how George Santos has fabricated his claims on his resume and the use of pictures of him inside the House Chamber, almost paparazzi-like. Through sitting alone and walking alone, we, as the audience, see no interaction between him and the other representatives, which makes the statements of him looking shy and anxious that someone will make fun of him seem true. The article also seems like an opinion piece as it is under the lifestyle category of the paper. Along with this, the tone of the article and word choice become pronounced. Its goal is to ridicule Santos. Just from the first sentence, the audience will be alluded to the point of the post: 

“On Tuesday, looking very much like a freshman at a prep school in hell, congressman-elect George Santos wore a black backpack, a periwinkle sweater underneath his navy jacket, and a sullen face with darting, evasive eyes, as if looking to see if anyone on Capitol Hill was going to accuse him of yet another lie about the basic facts of his existence” (Zak & Terris). 

EVIDENCE: Zak and Terris claim that certain essential aspects about Santos, like where he works and went to school, have been false: 

“Last month, the New York Times delineated apparent fabrications in Santos’s work and educational backgrounds: He apparently did not work at Goldman Sachs or Citigroup; he apparently did not go to Baruch College or New York University” (Zak & Terris). 

The article referenced is from NYT, written by Grace Ashford and Michael Gold, highlighting the false claims Santos made about where he worked and graduated from. The report lists Santos’s false claims of having a tax-exempt charity organization, financial disclosures on real estate, and a criminal background that alludes to fraud he had done in Brazil. 

Along with his lawyer, Joseph Murray, in a written response to the New York Times article: 

“It is no surprise that Congressman-elect Santos has enemies at the New York Times who are attempting to smear his good name with these defamatory allegations” (Zak & Terris). Santos then commented on this with an apology for any further disappointment he had caused. Yet, adhering to the fact that he will still be sworn into office and it is inevitable. 

LOGIC: Overall, the article’s flow of evidence makes sense to the point of ridiculing Santos and first talking about his disposition at the House chamber, referencing the NYT article and summarizing the major false claims he has made about himself, and then pleading the 5th when reporters bombarded him both inside and outside Capitol Hill. The article does have a trace of fundamental attribution error since the photos, about how he was described as a “loner,” seem to overemphasize the fact that he was not being spoken to and, therefore, is judgemental of his behavior. 

LEFT OUT: The central aspect that I felt was missing was whether or not Santos was once a drag queen, as this was also something that Santos denies being true. Overall, the point of this article was to ridicule George Santos and make clear that politicians like him can heavily fabricate his history to be elected.

George Santos outside of Manhattan Court, April 4, 2023: John Taggart for WP via Getty Images

Screentime High Scores

September 5, 2023

Media Consumption Log

The majority of my time spent on my phone screen is on TikTok. I’ve come to the habit and realized that when I’m in my free time, I’m either scrolling aimlessly on that app or an app similar to it. As much as TikTok has offered me insight into my favorite subcultures, serotonin-boosting videos around the nation, and sometimes in the world, I often feel—unproductive. It was worse over the summer, but luckily, school has started, and I actively get time away from my phone. But I can’t help it; my silly little brain loves those 15-second clips. 

Original tweet by @jimmyoutsold

From tracking my media consumption on TikTok, the types of videos that would appear on my for you page were mainly cooking videos and meme-related content within the pop culture realm. These were videos that I would like, share, or save, so the app figured out my interests quickly. I’m grateful for the type of content that would continuously appear on my for you page, consisting of Italian home-cooked meals, quick and easy meal prep, or a line cook showing step-by-step meal preparations. I get scolded a lot by my friend group because of how much I love to watch people cook on TikTok. I guess I could say on my Cook-Tok, and I love it!

Quote tweet from @cineophile from original tweet by @FilmUpdates
Quote tweet by @vveetto on an original tweet from @YayAreaNews

The meme-related content is available on all social media platforms I consume. Mainly from TikTok, Instagram reels show more of what the people I follow like, and Twitter represents more of the subcultures I follow. These include film Twitter and gay Twitter. The type of content I consume within Twitter subcultures is heavily niche-based, to the point where one would need to understand specific past pop culture references. Many tweets include Vine content, film premiere live tweeting, old Family Guy episode clips, and TikTok sensation Sabrina Brier. Here are some notable entries: 

My friend Melany (right) I (left)

As much as I enjoy doing absolutely nothing after a long week and hitting my screen time high score, I feel that I don’t utilize the free time I have efficiently on other attributes within my life. This consists of spending time with my roommate and family and taking advantage of the time I have to practice DJing and cooking. Since both hobbies I’ve aspired to come from media consumption, I could use the videos I save to cook those recipes or practice mixing with the tips other DJs have cared to share, edit, and post on TikTok. This becomes the significance of the type of media I consume on social media to be a positive aspect in my life through honing my hobbies. Yet, the potential consequences are that I do nothing about it. I just sit like, save, or share for that dopamine boost. It becomes not very rewarding after I tell myself I can go on my phone after I finish an assignment. I understand I’m not the only one; sometimes, I even get TikToks of people expressing that they have been unproductive since downloading TikTok and having that pattern during quarantining and letting it bleed into college. I am hopefully realizing this through this assignment; I would utilize my time on social media efficiently and allow it to motivate me to continue pursuing my hobbies alongside the time I spend on my college coursework.

Devon Aoki from 2 Fast 2 Furious

———————————————————————————————————————————————

Sara Landry | Boiler Room x Teletech Festival 2023

Ayo Edebiri & Rachel Sennott Talk Wildest Night Out and Grossest Hangover Food | Thirst Trap | ELLE

Playlist I listened to this week after enjoying You Are So Not Invited to My Bat Mitzvah